Wednesday, November 20, 2019

MN7181 - Learning Styles


Introduction

Basic Learning Cycles / Styles have been developed and Following article will be discussed mainly on Kolbs Learning Cycle as an approach to learning styles  ( Honey and Mumford, 1989 ) & VAK Learn ing Styles (Barbe, 1979 )

The Experiential Learning Cycle - Kolbs Learning Cycle 


Kolb's experiential learning style theory is typically represented by a four-stage learning cycle in which the learner 'touches all the bases':

learning styles Kolb


    1. Concrete Experience - a new experience or situation is encountered, or a reinterpretation of existing experience.
    2. Reflective Observation of the New Experience - of particular importance are any inconsistencies between experience and understanding.
    3. Abstract Conceptualization reflection gives rise to a new idea, or a modification of an existing abstract concept (the person has learned from their experience).
    4. Active Experimentation - the learner applies their idea(s) to the world around them to see what happens.

Effective learning is seen when a person progresses through a cycle of four stages: of (1) having a concrete experience followed by (2) observation of and reflection on that experience which leads to (3) the formation of abstract concepts (analysis) and generalizations (conclusions) which are then (4) used to test hypothesis in future situations, resulting in new experiences.




Kolb (1974) views learning as an integrated process with each stage being mutually supportive of and feeding into the next. It is possible to enter the cycle at any stage and follow it through its logical sequence.


Learning Style of Honey and Mumford, 1989 ) 



Learning styles were developed by Peter Honey and Alan Mumford, based upon the work of Kolb, and they identified four distinct learning styles or preferences: Activist, Theorist; Pragmatist and Reflector. These are the learning approaches that individuals naturally prefer and they recommend that in order to maximize one's own personal learning each learner ought to:

  • understand their learning style
  • seek out opportunities to learn using that style

To understand your particular learning style Honey and Mumford have developed a Learning Style Questionnaire [see further reading] and with this information, you will be in a far better position to do three really useful things [quoting P. Honey]:

  1. "Become smarter at getting a better fit between learning opportunities and the way you learn best. This makes your learning easier, more effective and more enjoyable. It saves you tackling your learning on a hit-and-miss basis. Equipped with information about your learning preferences, you'll have many more hits and fewer misses."
  2. "Expand the 'band width' of experiences from which you derive benefit. Becoming an all-round learner, increases your versatility and helps you learn from a wide variety of different experiences - some formal, some informal, some planned and some spontaneous."
  3. "Improve your learning skills and processes. Increased awareness of how you learn, opens up the whole process to self-scrutiny and improvement. Learning to learn is your most important capability since it provides the gateway to everything else you want to develop."

Note: However, to be an effective learner you should also develop the ability to learn in other styles too.

Characteristics


The characteristics of the four learning styles are summarized in the following table  Honey & Mumford (1982) 


Learning style
Attributes 
Activities 
Activist
Activists are those people who learn by doing. Activists need to get their hands dirty, to dive in with both feet first. Have an open-minded approach to learning, involving themselves fully and without bias in new experiences.
·         brainstorming
·         problem solving
·         group discussion
·         puzzles
·         competitions
·         role-play
Pragmatist
These people need to be able to see how to put the learning into practice in the real world. Abstract concepts and games are of limited use unless they can see a way to put the ideas into action in their lives. Experimenters, trying out new ideas, theories and techniques to see if they work.
·         time to think about how to apply learning in reality
·         case studies
·         problem solving
·         discussion
Reflector
These people learn by observing and thinking about what happened. They may avoid leaping in and prefer to watch from the sidelines.  Prefer to stand back and view experiences from a number of different perspectives, collecting data and taking the time to work towards an appropriate conclusion.
·         paired discussions
·         self analysis questionnaires
·         personality questionnaires
·         time out
·         observing activities
·         feedback from others
·         coaching
·         interviews
Theorist
These learners like to understand the theory behind the actions. They need models, concepts and facts in order to engage in the learning process. Prefer to analyse and synthesise, drawing new information into a systematic and logical 'theory'.
·         models
·         statistics
·         stories
·         quotes
·         background information
·         applying theories



McLeod, S. A. (2017, Oct 24). Kolb - learning styles. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/learning-kolb.html

Bibliography 

Kolb, D. A. (1976). The Learning Style Inventory: Technical Manual. Boston, MA: McBer.
Kolb, D.A. (1981). Learning styles and disciplinary differences, in: A.W. Chickering (Ed.) The Modern American College (pp. 232–255). San Francisco, LA: Jossey-Bass.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (Vol. 1). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Kolb, D. A., & Fry, R. (1975). Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. In C. Cooper (Ed.), Studies of group process (pp. 33–57). New York: Wiley.
Kolb, D. A., Rubin, I. M., & McIntyre, J. M. (1984). Organizational psychology: readings on human behavior in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  1. Honey, P. & Mumford, A. (1982) Manual of Learning Styles London: P Honey
  2. PeterHoney.com [eternal link]

9 comments:

  1. Good article,clearly explained related about your subject

    ReplyDelete
  2. Really helpful, please make more!!! Keep doing!

    ReplyDelete
  3. References are expected, not the bibliography

    Please follow the Harvard reference and citation style.

    Whatever the references listed should have been cited in the main text. In other words, only cited reference should be listed as references.

    Please don't forget the words limit of 350.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Koleb's learning cycle represents the effective learning process of a person. Agreed to your arguments. Very informative.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Briefly describe about the learning styles.good job.interesting article.

    ReplyDelete
  6. There is a debate which is currently happening where people doubt that i=is this model relevant in the current age? you should look into this as well, anyways thankyou for the great article!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Highly descriptive article with excellent elaborations and some of the citations not referenced. Instructed word count exceeded too much.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Well discussed about the learning styles! How banking sector use these styles in there day to day life?

    ReplyDelete
  9. You have comprehensively described the basics of learning styles in this blog. You could have applied its application to your banking sector like in other blogs.

    ReplyDelete

MN7181 - People & Organization - importance of ethics in Banking Business

Resource : V- comply editorial , ( 2014 )  Regulations & Ethics , the two controversial words which has led to forming and con...